Explainable ML-Based Time Source Arbitration for 5G Networks: Feature Engineering, Contextual Memory, and the Stability Paradox
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48149/jciees.2026.6.1.2Keywords:
Explainable AI, Feature Engineering, Random Forest, Synchronization, BMCA, Flapping, Hysteresis, 5G, PTP, Oscillator SensitivityAbstract
The Best Master Clock Algorithm (BMCA) of IEEE 1588 selects timing sources without memory, measured quality awareness, or explainability—three properties increasingly demanded by 5G operators managing critical synchronization infrastructure. This paper presents a feature engineering and classification methodology addressing all three limitations through: (1) a multi-scale rolling statistics framework transforming raw PTP telemetry into semantically rich features capturing anomalies, stability indicators, and drift dynamics; (2) a recursive memory mechanism (prev_decision) implementing learned adaptive hysteresis via Bayesian conditional probability, eliminating flapping without manual threshold tuning; and (3) full decision explainability through Random Forest feature importance analysis (MDI). Experimental results reveal a counterintuitive stability paradox: under high-PDV conditions, the algorithm performing 1,318 source switches achieves zero ITU-T G.8271.1 mask violations, while the algorithm performing only 2 switches records 209 violations. Feature importance analysis confirms that rolling standard deviation (σ_TE) and previous decision (x_prev) dominate in adversarial scenarios, validating the hypothesis that contextual memory is the missing component in conventional synchronization management. Sensitivity analysis across oscillator classes demonstrates that ML-based arbitration with inexpensive TCXO hardware outperforms standard BMCA with rubidium oscillators, proving that algorithmic intelligence can substitute for hardware investment.
Metrics
References
G. P. Sharma et al., “Toward Deterministic Communica-tions in 6G Networks: State of the Art, Open Challenges and the Way Forward,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 106898–106923, 2023.
IEEE, “IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchroniza-tion Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Sys-tems,” IEEE Std 1588-2019, Jun. 2020.
M. Lévesque and D. Tipper, “A Survey of Clock Synchro-nization Over Packet-Switched Networks,” IEEE Commun. Sur-veys Tuts., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2926–2947, 2016.
F. Girela-López et al., “IEEE 1588 High Accuracy Default Profile: Applications and Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 45211–45220, 2020.
D. Chandramouli, P. Andrés-Maldonado, and T. Kolding, “Evolution of Timing Services From 5G-A Toward 6G,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 35150–35157, 2023.
C. Zhang et al., “Three-Way Selection Random Forest Op-timization Model for Anomaly Traffic Detection,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1788, 2023.
G. Giorgi, “An Event-Based Kalman Filter for Clock Syn-chronization,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 449–457, 2015.
Y.-D. Seo et al., “Improved Time-Synchronization Algo-rithm Based on Direct Compensation of Disturbance Effects,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 16, p. 3499, 2019.
Z. Wang et al., “Time Synchronization for 5G and TSN In-tegrated Networking,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2969–2980, 2025.
A. Nasrallah et al., “Ultra-Low Latency (ULL) Networks: The IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet Standards,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 88–145, 2019.
T. Iliev and I. Penkov, “AI-Driven Trust Score-Based Syn-chronization Control for Robust 5G and Beyond Networks,” in Proc. ICAI 2025, pp. 504–509.
P. Assimakopoulos et al., “A Converged Evolved Ethernet Fronthaul for the 5G Era,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2528–2537, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Journal of CIEES

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









