AMSA: An Adaptive ML-Based Synchronization Arbiter for Resilient Time Distribution in 5G and Beyond Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48149/jciees.2024.4.1.7Keywords:
5G synchronization, IEEE 1588, BMCA, machine learning, random forest, precision time protocol, time error, holdover, GNSS spoofing, ITU-T G.8271.1.Abstract
Fifth-generation (5G) and emerging 6G mobile networks impose stringent timing requirements (|TE| ≤ ±1.5 μs per ITU-T G.8271.1) that the static Best Master Clock Algorithm (BMCA) of IEEE 1588 cannot reliably guarantee under real-world conditions involving packet delay variation (PDV), Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) outages, and signal spoofing. This paper presents AMSA (Adaptive ML-based Synchronization Arbiter), a four-stage intelligent software overlay that replaces the deterministic BMCA with a data-driven, context-aware time source selection mechanism. The proposed architecture integrates Gamma-distributed PDV filtering, polynomial-regression-based holdover prediction (termed Virtual Rubidium), trust-score fault detection, and a Random Forest classifier trained on a hybrid dataset of operational telemetry and synthetic anomalies for adaptive source arbitration. AMSA is validated through a Monte Carlo simulation framework across four distinct operational scenarios and corroborated with field measurement data from an operational 5G transport network. Results demonstrate that AMSA reduces the 95th-percentile time error by 55% compared to standard BMCA, eliminates all 209 ITU-T G.8271.1 mask violations observed under high-PDV conditions, extends holdover autonomy by over 30%, and detects covert GNSS spoofing within 250 seconds. Field validation across three scenarios achieves 100% agreement with independent expert assessments, including correct classification of out-of-distribution anomalies.
Metrics
References
G. P. Sharma et al., “Toward Deterministic Communications in 6G Networks: State of the Art, Open Challenges and the Way Forward,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 106898–106923, 2023.
A. Nasrallah et al., “Ultra-Low Latency (ULL) Networks: The IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet Standards and Related 5G ULL Research,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 88–145, 2019.
D. Chandramouli, P. Andrés-Maldonado, and T. Kolding, “Evolution of Timing Services From 5G-A Toward 6G,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 35150–35157, 2023.
IEEE, “IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems,” IEEE Std 1588-2019, Jun. 2020.
M. Lévesque and D. Tipper, “A Survey of Clock Synchronization Over Packet-Switched Networks,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2926–2947, 2016.
F. Girela-López et al., “IEEE 1588 High Accuracy Default Profile: Applications and Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 45211–45220, 2020.
G. Giorgi, “An Event-Based Kalman Filter for Clock Synchronization,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 449–457, 2015.
Y.-D. Seo et al., “Improved Time-Synchronization Algorithm Based on Direct Compensation of Disturbance Effects,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 16, p. 3499, 2019.
A. Mahmood, “Industrial IoT in 5G-and-beyond networks: Vision, architecture, and design trends,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 4122–4137, Jun. 2022.
C. Zhang et al., “Three-Way Selection Random Forest Optimization Model for Anomaly Traffic Detection,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1788, 2023.
T. Iliev and I. Penkov, “AI-Driven Trust Score-Based Synchronization Control for Robust 5G and Beyond Networks,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Automatics and Informatics (ICAI), (in press).
P. Assimakopoulos et al., “A Converged Evolved Ethernet Fronthaul for the 5G Era,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2528–2537, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Journal of CIEES

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









