Assessment of Digital Infrastructure Maturity in Bulgarian Scholarly Libraries: Empirical Study of Automation and AI Adoption

Authors

  • Viktoriya Ivanova University Library, University of Ruse “Angel Kanchev”, Ruse, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48149/jciees.2026.6.1.3

Keywords:

Digital maturity index, Libraries, Chi-square test, Spearman correlation

Abstract

Scholarly libraries play central role in providing services for introduction and management of scientific data, including infrastructures for institutional repositories and metadata support. In the context of complex digital research activities, scholarly libraries support access, preservation and distribution of digital resources. AI supported services give new perspectives to information sciences and widen opportunities for innovations and cooperation. Purpose of the article is to assess the digital infrastructure maturity in Bulgarian scholarly libraries and to perform empirical study of automation and AI adoption. For achieving this goal, a survey is carried out among Bulgarian scholarly libraries. It outlines the infrastructural capacity and the basic parameters, necessary for the introduction of a measurement model. The Curation Lifestyle Model is adapted to perform quantity measurement of parameters and calculate a Digital maturity index (DIMI). After that, Pearson chi-square test is performed to check the correlation between the size of the university and the DIMI. Finally, Spearman correlation formula is used to establish a relation between DIMI and AI adoption.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Oyedokun (2024). Navigating the dynamics of present-day academic libraries: An in-depth analysis of strategies, challenges, and emerging trends, IFLA Journal. DOI: 10.1177/03400352241291907.

Tenopir, C., Sandusky, R.J., Allard, S., and Birch, B. (2014). Research Data Management Services in Academic Research Libraries and Perceptions of Librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 36, 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003

Patel, C. (2025). Recent Advancements in Management and Academic Library Sciences: The Digital Evolution of Scholarly Libraries.163–172. https://doi.org/10.62823/mgm/9789349468160/13

Mosha, N.F.; Ngulube, P. Metadata (2023). Standard for Continuous Preservation, Discovery, and Reuse of Research Data in Repositories by Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Review, Information, 14, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080427

Cox, A.M., Pinfield, S. and Rutter, S. (2019). The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 37 (3). pp. 418-435. ISSN: 0737-8831 https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2018-0105

Ali M.Y., Naeem S.B., Bhatti R., Richardson J. (2024). rtificial intelligence application in university libraries of Pakistan: SWOT analysis and implications. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, Vol. 73 No. 1-2 pp. 219–234, https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-12-2021-0203.

Feng Y. and Richards L. (2018). A review of digital curation professional competencies: theory and current practices. Records Manag J201, 8; 28(1): 62–78. DOI:10.1108/RMJ-09-2016-0022.

Hudson-Vitale C., Carlson J.R., Hadley H., et al. (2021). Introduction to the special JeSLIB issue on data curation in practice. J EScience Librarianship 10(3): 13.

Higgins, S. (2008). The DCC curation lifecycle model. International Journal of Digital Curation 3(1). Retrieved October 18, from http://www.ijdc.net/ijdc/article/view/69/69.

Gökalp, E. and Martinez, V. (2021). Digital transformation maturity assessment: development of the digital transformation capability maturity model. International Journal of Production Research.https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1991020.

Minh, H. and Pham, H. (2022). Comprehensive review of Digital Maturity Model and Proposal for a Continuous digital transformation process with Digital Maturity Model integration. Sistemas & Gestão. DOI: 10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.1.97

Higgins, S. (2009). DCC DIFFUSE Standards Frameworks: A Standards Path through the Curation Lifecycle. International Journal of Digital Curation. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.

Tenopir, C., Dane H., Suzie A., Mike F., Ben B., Lynn B., Robert S., Madison L., and Andrew L. (2015). Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future? Journal of eScience Librarianship, 4(2): e1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1085.

Cox, A. (2023). How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies literature and the theory of the professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Ivanova, V. (2026). Assessment of Digital Infrastructure Maturity in Bulgarian Scholarly Libraries: Empirical Study of Automation and AI Adoption. The Journal of CIEES, 6(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.48149/jciees.2026.6.1.3